{ "review_agent": "theatrical_readiness_board", "readiness_level": "theatrical_export_candidate", "score_100": 95.6, "planning_score_100": 95.3, "production_score_100": 95.6, "greenlight_thresholds": { "planning_greenlight": ">= 82 planning score and no shootability blockers", "provider_generation": "planning greenlight plus approved identity/style assets", "final_export": "production score >= 86, final_edit_review pass, and human viewing pass" }, "criteria": [ { "name": "story_engine", "score": 5.0, "weight": 1.4, "status": "pass", "note": "Protagonist, desire, pressure, dilemma, visible motif, and ending image are explicit.", "evidence": { "protagonist": "最后一位档案管理员", "arena": "潮湿、安静、随时可能失压的海底城市", "inciting_object": "一段和现实不一致的私人记忆", "antagonist_or_pressure": "一个温和却无处不在的 AI 系统", "desire": "确认哪一段记忆仍然属于自己", "dilemma": "保留被修饰后的安稳生活与公开刺痛所有人的真相", "dramatic_question": "最后一位档案管理员 能否在 一个温和却无处不在的 AI 系统 吞没真相之前完成 确认哪一段记忆仍然属于自己？", "visible_motif": "反复出现的旧照片、光斑和错位影像", "private_stakes": "如果失败，主角会连自己为什么坚持都忘掉。", "ending_image": "主角把最后的证据交给海面方向的一束光。" }, "improvement_actions": [ "Rewrite the story engine before shot generation if protagonist/desire/dilemma are generic." ] }, { "name": "causal_beat_chain", "score": 5.0, "weight": 1.2, "status": "pass", "note": "Each beat should cause the next beat, not simply describe a mood.", "evidence": [ "异常被看见，所以主角无法继续普通日常。", "主角试图否认，所以异常暴露出私人代价。", "外部压力介入，所以主角必须主动调查。", "调查带来证据，所以系统开始反制。", "反转重写目标，所以主角之前的方法失效。", "失败夺走退路，所以主角必须选择立场。", "选择被执行，所以世界状态发生可见改变。", "改变已经发生，所以结尾只留下情绪回声。" ], "improvement_actions": [ "Rewrite weak beats as cause/effect actions with one irreversible turn per beat." ] }, { "name": "emotional_arc", "score": 5.0, "weight": 1.1, "status": "pass", "note": "The emotional value should change across the film and land in the final beat.", "evidence": [ "curiosity_over_confusion", "intimacy_over_distance", "alarm_over_denial", "agency_over_passivity", "revelation_over_assumption", "loss_over_control", "choice_over_survival", "resonance_over_explanation" ], "improvement_actions": [ "Assign a distinct emotional value shift to each beat and make the last shot pay it off visually." ] }, { "name": "visual_motif_payoff", "score": 5.0, "weight": 1.0, "status": "pass", "note": "A tangible motif should recur and change state at turning points.", "evidence": { "motif": "反复出现的旧照片、光斑和错位影像", "anchors": [ "反复出现的旧照片、光斑和错位影像 第一次以不合逻辑的方式出现", "反复出现的旧照片、光斑和错位影像 被主角触碰、收起或误认", "反复出现的旧照片、光斑和错位影像 和外部压力发生第一次碰撞", "反复出现的旧照片、光斑和错位影像 被拆解成可追踪的线索", "反复出现的旧照片、光斑和错位影像 暴露出隐藏层或反向含义", "反复出现的旧照片、光斑和错位影像 几乎被摧毁或从主角手中消失", "反复出现的旧照片、光斑和错位影像 被主角主动使用，改变局面", "反复出现的旧照片、光斑和错位影像 以安静、明确的新状态留在结尾" ] }, "improvement_actions": [ "Make the motif visible in setup, midpoint reversal, crisis, final choice, and ending image." ] }, { "name": "coverage_and_blocking", "score": 5.0, "weight": 1.0, "status": "pass", "note": "The shotlist should provide editable coverage: space, character, insert, action, reaction, transition.", "evidence": { "establishing": 8, "character": 8, "insert": 8, "action": 8, "reaction": 8, "transition": 8 }, "improvement_actions": [ "Add missing coverage types or reduce repeated shot roles inside each beat." ] }, { "name": "cinematic_specificity", "score": 4.48, "weight": 1.0, "status": "pass", "note": "Shots should describe visible behavior, framing, camera motivation, and story consequence.", "evidence": [ "建立空间规则和异常入口：反复出现的旧照片、光斑和错位影像 第一次以不合逻辑的方式出现。", "让观众看见主角如何决定靠近或回避这一转折：最后一位档案管理员 在 潮湿、安静、随时可能失压的海底城市 的日常流程里看见第一个异常：一段和现实不一致的私人记忆 不该出现在那里。", "用一个可反复追踪的道具/细节承载线索：反复出现的旧照片、光斑和错位影像 第一次以不合逻辑的方式出现。", "用一个明确行动推动因果链：异常被看见，所以主角无法继续普通日常。", "记录选择造成的情绪后果，并让观众追问：潮湿、安静、随时可能失压的海底城市 为什么在第一个画面里就不对劲？", "把当前转折的后果带入下一场，保留 反复出现的旧照片、光斑和错位影像 第一次以不合逻辑的方式出现 的视觉回声。", "建立空间规则和异常入口：反复出现的旧照片、光斑和错位影像 被主角触碰、收起或误认。", "让观众看见主角如何决定靠近或回避这一转折：最后一位档案管理员 尝试用熟悉的规则解释异常，却发现 如果失败，主角会连自己为什么坚持都忘掉。" ], "improvement_actions": [ "Replace abstract purposes with physical actions, visible decisions, and concrete props." ] }, { "name": "generation_feasibility", "score": 4.0, "weight": 1.0, "status": "watch", "note": "High ambition must still be shootable by video models without overloaded single shots.", "evidence": { "status": "pass_with_constraints", "blocking_shots": [] }, "improvement_actions": [ "Split or simplify every blocked shot before spending provider budget." ] }, { "name": "identity_and_style_control", "score": 4.0, "weight": 0.9, "status": "watch", "note": "Film-level continuity needs approved identity, location, style, and first-frame assets.", "evidence": { "asset_gate_status": "ready_for_visual_review", "summary": { "total_assets": 35, "proxy_assets": 0, "missing_or_empty_assets": 0, "visual_review_assets": 35 } }, "improvement_actions": [ "Generate and review global style, protagonist, location, and first-frame assets before I2V." ] }, { "name": "continuity_contract", "score": 5.0, "weight": 0.8, "status": "pass", "note": "Each shot should carry explicit identity, location, style, motif, and reroll rules before provider generation.", "evidence": { "total_shots": 48, "risk_counts": { "low": 17, "medium": 30, "high": 1 }, "mode_counts": { "text_to_video": 17, "image_to_video": 30, "first_last_frame": 1 }, "identity_required_shots": 16, "first_frame_required_shots": 31, "last_frame_required_shots": 1, "required_asset_references": 94 }, "improvement_actions": [ "Regenerate quality/continuity_contract.json and ensure every I2V/first-last-frame shot has asset and reroll contracts." ] }, { "name": "render_budget_realism", "score": 5.0, "weight": 0.8, "status": "pass", "note": "Important or risky shots need enough candidate attempts to select a strong take.", "evidence": { "total_candidates": 136, "shot_count": 48 }, "improvement_actions": [ "Raise candidate counts for high-risk story turns; do not depend on first-take success." ] }, { "name": "post_production_traceability", "score": 5.0, "weight": 0.8, "status": "pass", "note": "Every final clip should be traceable to selected sources, segment QC, and an EDL.", "evidence": { "missing_segments": 0, "final_edit_status": "pass" }, "improvement_actions": [ "Populate takes, run segment QC, then lock the EDL only from selected reviewed clips." ] } ] }